Manure boosts greenhouse gas emissions – even in winter
Trials conducted by researchers have shown that farmers’ decisions for their land and manure use affect levels of greenhouse gases.
Researchers have stated that the decisions farmers make over the spring and summer months could dramatically increase greenhouse gas emissions in the winter.
Researchers at the University of Vermont showed that the impact of farmers’ manure use decisions extend beyond the growing season to influence emissions on warm winter days.
“This could have big impacts as winters become warmer and soils thaw more frequently,” said lead author Carol Adair, of UVM’s Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources and Gund Institute for Environment. “If croplands move farther north with warming climates, this could increase the contributions of agriculture to global GHG emissions.”
The study, published in Soil Science Society of America Journal, provides some of the first measures of GHG emissions from agricultural soils in Vermont and highlights important trade-offs with current agriculture practices, such as injecting manure into soils.
While it’s known that farmers’ decisions to add nutrients to their fields affects greenhouse gas emissions during the growing season, Adair and colleagues find that these choices have long-lasting effects: they can increase emissions of powerful greenhouse gases, especially nitrous oxide (N2O), during wintertime thaws.
Emissions of GHGs (CO2 and N2O) from agricultural soils have been well-studied during the growing season, much less so during winter. Understanding the lasting consequences of management decisions is becoming more critical, as agriculture is expected to expand and intensify in northern regions as the climate warms, researchers say.
“By injecting manure, farmers are trying to do the right thing and keep manure on the farm, in their soils and crops, and out of waterways,” said Adair. “These results, in conjunction with our previous research that found injection to also increase emissions during the growing season, suggest that there may be important tradeoffs to consider when deciding on a method of manure application.”
GHG emissions result from the activity of soil microbes, such as bacteria, which break down manure into nutrients useable by crops. “During typical winters, when soils are very cold, microbes basically hibernate, but they are just waiting for the right conditions to be active again,” said Adair. “When soils warm up just a bit – or thaw – microbes wake up and quickly start producing GHGs.”
Researchers conducted a laboratory study on frozen soils collected from field trials in Vermont. The agricultural lands received different methods of manure application (broadcast, broadcast plus incorporation by plow, and injection) during the growing season. In the lab, researchers subjected soil cores to either a frozen, freeze/thaw, or thaw treatment for eight days.
The research team found that the method of manure application strongly impacted emission rates of CO2 and N2O – a GHG roughly 300 times more powerful at trapping heat than CO2 – from soils. During winter thaws, N2O emissions from manure-injected soils were up to 20 times greater than emissions from soils with surface broadcast or broadcast plus plow manure application.
Release of CO2 and N2O was up to eight times greater from soils that thawed than from soils left frozen, but this varied depending on manure application method. Nitrous oxide emissions from injected soils were 2-3 times greater than from soils broadcast with manure and 4-19 times greater than from soils broadcast and plowed. The type of manure application also affected CO2 but not nearly as much as it affected N2O.
The researchers have some theories as to why GHG emissions are greater with manure injection and plan further study. “Microbes that produce CO2 and N2O need carbon and nitrate, and injections of manure 6-8 inches below the soil surface may increase availability of those nutrients,” said Adair. “Another potential reason is that the manure application treatments change microbial communities; there may be more of the type of microbe that produces N2O in injected soils.”
“This study gave us an incredibly useful launching point for expanding this research, and enabled us to work with more Vermont farmers,” said Lindsay Barbieri, PhD student in the Rubenstein School and Gund Institute. “Together we’re monitoring GHG emissions, alongside water quality, crop yield, and other measurements, from agricultural soils and practices. This is happening directly in the field, for longer periods of time, as we work to better understand the complexities of agricultural practices and the role of GHG emissions in Vermont.”